PERANAN FASHION DAN PAKAIAN SEBAGAI KOMUNIKASI IDENTITAS SOSIAL

Authors

  • Netty Lisdiantini Politeknik Negeri Madiun
  • Subiyantoro Politeknik Negeri Madiun
  • Yosi Afandi Politeknik Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32486/epicheirisi.v3i1.460

Keywords:

dress policy, social identity, orderly, discipline

Abstract

As one of the clearest markers of many outward appearance markers, clothing is a distinctive individual and group identity. Therefore, even though being worn in a single organization, the symbol of uniform can have its own identity and tradition. Fashion and clothing are ways that individuals use to determine themselves as individuals and express some of their uniqueness. As a form of individualistic expression, there are values in fashion that are promoted or communicated through what is displayed. Relating this concept to dress policies for students of the Madiun State Polytechnic Business Administration Study Program on certain days. In terms of context, the evaluation results using the CIPP evaluation model (context, input, process, product) shows that, the implementation of this policy supports a character that is more disciplined, obedient and orderly in regulations, creates authority through habituation and can reduce economic inequality and establish a sense of belonging towards the Study Program institutions and a sense of unity, as an identity or differentiation with other Study Program students. With regard to input, although there are various reactions to the implementation of the policy, there is no direct rejection. From the prospective of process, the means used are announcements posted on the Announcement Board of the Department and policy writing in the Guidebook. Whereas in terms of product, the changes that occur after students wear uniforms are to be more orderly, more disciplined, more controlled in acting, as well as feeling more authoritative, and can be emulated

References

Akib, Haedar dan Antonius Tarigan. “Artikulasi Konsep Implementasi Kebijakan: Perspektif, Model dan Kriteria Pengukurannya,” Jurnal Baca, Volume 1 Agustus 2008, Universitas

Pepabari Makassar. 2008

Ardianto, Elvinaro. Metode Penelitian untuk Public Relations: Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Simbiosa Rekatama. 2010.

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Abdul Jabar, Cepi Safrudin. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan, Pedoman Teoritis bagi Praktisi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara:Jakarta. 2004.

Badudu, J.S dan Sutan Mohammad Zain. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta:Pustaka Sinar Harapan. 2001.

Bardach, Eugene. The Implementation Game.

Cambridge: MIT Press. 1977.

Budiati, A.C., Liestyasari, S.I., & Nugraha, Y.H.T. Simbolisme Dunia Pendidikan (Studi Semiotik tentang Makna Seragam Sekolah dan Implikasinya bagi Pendidikan Berkarakter di Kota Surakarta). Laporan Penelitian Tidak Dipublikasikan. FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. 2010.

Bungin, H.M Burhan. Sosiologi Komunikasi. Jakarta : Kencana, 2007

Direktorat Ketenagaan dan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional.

Kerangka Acuan Pendidikan Karakter Tahun Anggaran 2010. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. 2010.

Edward III, George C (edited), Public Policy Implementing, Jai Press Inc, London- England.Goggin, Malcolm L et al. 1990.

Eko Putro Widoyoko,S. Evaluasi Program

Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. 2009.

Fredrickson dan Hart. Kebijakan Publik dan Formulasi Jakarta: Sinar Harapan. 2003.

Hasanah, A. (2009). Pendidikan Berbasis Karakter. Diperoleh 9 April 2012, dari http://www.bit.lipi.go.id/masyarakat- literasi/index.php/pendidikanberbasis-karakter

Hidayatullah, Furqon, Pendidikan Karakter; Membangun Peradaban Bangsa, Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka,. 2010.

Hogwood, Brian W, and Lewis A. Gunn, Policy Analysis for the Real World, Oxford University Press. 1986.

Husaini Usman, Manajemen,Teori, Praktik dan Riset Pendidikan, Bumi Aksara,Jakarta, 2006.

KBBI, 2016. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). [Online] Available at: http://kbbi.web.id/pusat, [Diakses September 2018]

Mazmanian, Daniel A and Paul A. Sabatier, Implementation and PublicPolicy. USA:Scott Foresman and Company. 1983.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.

Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya. 2009.

Nawawi, Hadari. Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial.Jakarta: Gadjah Mada University. 2003.

Nurdin Usman, Konteks Implementasi Berbasis Kurikulum, Grasindo, Jakarta, 2002

Nordholt, H.S (Ed). Outward Appearances (Trend, Identitas, Kepentingan). Terj. M.Imam Aziz.Yogyakarta: Lkis. 2005.

Parwito. Penelitian Komunikasi Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: PT. LKiS Pelangi Aksara. 2007 Poerwandari, E.K. Pendekatan kualitatif untuk penelitian perilaku manusia. Jakarta : LPSP3 Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia. 2007.

Purwanto, Erwan Agus dan Dyah Ratih Sulistyastuti. Implementasi Kebijakan Publik: Konsep dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Gava Media: Yogyakarta. 2012.

Rahman, Masykur Arif. Pentingnya Disiplin Belajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta. 2011.

Randall P. Harrison The Cartoon: Communication to the Quick (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1981). Book Review.

Richard Jenkins, Social Identity, Third Edition, (United Kingdom: Routledge, 2008.

Sugiyono. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung:CV. Alfabeta. 2005.

Sulastomo, Managemen Kesehatan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. 2004.

Tangkilisan, Hessel Nogi S. Kebijakan Publik yang Membumi. Yogyakarta:Yayasan Pembaruan Aministrasi Publik Indonesia (YPAPI) & Lukman Offset. 2003.

Widoyoko S, Eko Putro. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. 2009.

Winarno, Budi, Kebijakan Publik : Teori dan Proses, Jakarta: PT Buku Kita. 2008.

Published

15-05-2019

How to Cite

Netty Lisdiantini, Subiyantoro, & Yosi Afandi. (2019). PERANAN FASHION DAN PAKAIAN SEBAGAI KOMUNIKASI IDENTITAS SOSIAL. Epicheirisi: Jurnal Manajemen, Administrasi, Pemasaran Dan Kesekretariatan, 3(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.32486/epicheirisi.v3i1.460

Issue

Section

Articles