Peer Review Process

The Journal operates a peer review process and promotes blind reviewing.
The acceptance or rejection of articles will be decided by the editorial boards based on the review results supplied by the reviewers.
There are no communications between authors and editors concerning the rejection decision.
Authors whose papers are rejected will be informed of the reasons for the rejection.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow the focus scope, and author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using Turnitin software.

The research article submitted to this journal will be peer-reviewed by at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript.

The final decision on article acceptance will be made by the Editors according to the reviewers' comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by the Editor in Chief by considering a sequence of accepted dates and geographical distribution of authors as well as thematic issues.